Search for: All records

ABSTRACT We report the first instance of an M dwarf/brown dwarf obliquity measurement for the TOI-2119 system using the Rossiter–McLaughlin effect. TOI-2119 b is a transiting brown dwarf orbiting a young, active early M dwarf ($$T_{\rm {eff}}$$ = 3553 K). It has a mass of 64.4 M$$_{\rm {J}}$$ and radius of 1.08 R$$_{\rm {J}}$$, with an eccentric orbit (e = 0.3) at a period of 7.2 d. For this analysis, we utilize NEID spectroscopic transit observations and ground-based simultaneous transit photometry from the Astrophysical Research Consortium and the Las Campanas Remote Observatory. We fit all available data of TOI-2119 b to refine the brown dwarf parameters and update the ephemeris. The classical Rossiter–McLaughlin technique yields a projected star–planet obliquity of $$\lambda =-0.8\pm 1.1^\circ$$ and a three-dimensional obliquity of $$\psi =15.7\pm 5.5^\circ$$. Additionally, we spatially resolve the stellar surface of TOI-2119 utilizing the Reloaded Rossiter–McLaughlin technique to determine the projected star–planet obliquity as $$\lambda =1.26 \pm 1.3^{\circ }$$. Both of these results agree within $$2\sigma$$ and confirm the system is aligned, where TOI-2119 b joins an emerging group of aligned brown dwarf obliquities. We also probe stellar surface activity on the surface of TOI-2119 in the form of centre-to-limb variations as well as the potential for differential rotation. Overall, we find tentative evidence for centre-to-limb variations on the star but do not detect evidence of differential rotation. 

Abstract Measured spectral shifts due to intrinsic stellar variability (e.g., pulsations, granulation) and activity (e.g., spots, plages) are the largest source of error for extreme-precision radial-velocity (EPRV) exoplanet detection. Several methods are designed to disentangle stellar signals from true center-of-mass shifts due to planets. The Extreme-precision Spectrograph (EXPRES) Stellar Signals Project (ESSP) presents a self-consistent comparison of 22 different methods tested on the same extreme-precision spectroscopic data from EXPRES. Methods derived new activity indicators, constructed models for mapping an indicator to the needed radial-velocity (RV) correction, or separated out shape- and shift-driven RV components. Since no ground truth is known when using real data, relative method performance is assessed using the total and nightly scatter of returned RVs and agreement between the results of different methods. Nearly all submitted methods return a lower RV rms than classic linear decorrelation, but no method is yet consistently reducing the RV rms to sub-meter-per-second levels. There is a concerning lack of agreement between the RVs returned by different methods. These results suggest that continued progress in this field necessitates increased interpretability of methods, high-cadence data to capture stellar signals at all timescales, and continued tests like the ESSP using consistent data sets with more advanced metrics for method performance. Future comparisons should make use of various well-characterized data sets—such as solar data or data with known injected planetary and/or stellar signals—to better understand method performance and whether planetary signals are preserved.